CROONER TONY DIAMOND

AS  I WROTE BEFORE I DISCOVRED  A NEW CROONER TONY DIAMOND ? HE IS NOT YET VERY FAMOUS BUT I THINK HE DESERVE TO BE ? BECAUSE TONY HAS A GREAT VOICE TO CROON AND HE REMIND ME MUCH VIC DAMONE. TONY DIAMOND A NAME TO BE REMEMBERED….

michael buble might sing Sinatra?

michael buble might sing Sinatra? but he can’t pair sinatra! because buble has a flat and  toneless voice and he is unable to hold a single note!!!! while Sinatra voice was rich and powerful till the end ! buble moan like a pussy !!!! and he is just a regular cover singer, many lounge singer in Vegas are better than buble !!!!! but michael buble got the back up of the fmr canadian prime minister mulroney to start his career !!! Sinatra had the best timing and the best phrasing of all the time, while michael buble has the worst phrasing and the worst tempo of all the time! michael buble he is just the joke in the world of music and his fans are deaf and blind to see the truth about him! he is just worthless! and an impostor as well, he truly sucks and those who compare him to Sinatra are just bunch of dreamer!!!!!!! Sinatra was the big STAR not a buffoon like buble the faker.

DEAN MARTIN KING OF COOL

DEAN MARTIN WAS THE KING OF COOL ? HIS WAY OF SINGING WAS EFFORTLESS AND COOL AND EASY, BUT ALWAYS DEEP AND VERY PLEASANT TO HEAR! MAYBE BECAUSE OF HIS FABLOUS VOICE? DINO WAS A GENUINE TALENTED ARTIST NOT A FAKER LIKE MICHAEL BUBLE??? DINO WAS DINO AND NOBODY ELSE WILL BE ABLE TO COPY OR PAIR DINO IN THIS WORLD! DINO WAS THE KING OF COOL.

FRANK SINATRA CAN’T BE PAIRED?

WHY FRANK SINATRA IS SUCH A GREAT ENTERTAINER ???? THE REASON IS HE WAS SO TALENTED AND GIFTED BY NATURE? HIS VOICE AND VIBRATO WAS UNIQUE PLUS HE KNEW HOW TO BRING HOME NEW SOUNDS SUCH AS BOSSA NOVA AND MORE …. SINATRA WAS THE KING OF CROONERS WHEN ALL GREAT CROONERS WERE ALIVE SUCH AS BING CROSBY , DICK HAYMES, DEAN MARTIN , TONY MARTIN ” STILL ALIVE” AND HE OVERSHADOWED THEM ALL! SINATRA WAS A MAN OF CHALLENGE A MAN ABLE TO GIVE 3 SHOWS EVERY NIGHTS AT SANDS IN VEGAS ? SINATRA WAS A MAN NOT A PUPPET LIKE MICHAEL BUBLE ? SINATRA WAS ABLE TO SING WITH MIC’S OFF ? HE WAS THE VOICE.

WHY MICHAEL BUBLE SUCKS?

MICHAEL BUBLE HE SUCKS SIMPLY BECAUSE HE IS FAKE? HIS VOICE IS FLAT AND HE CAN’T HOLD A NOTE PLUS HE GOT NO VIBRATO AND EVEN WITH AUTO TUNE HE SING OFF PITCH? SO HOW HE DARE TO CALL HIMSELF A CROONER ????? WELL TRUE CROONERS ARE ALL HAVING A HIGH RANGE VOICE WITH VIBRATO LIKE TONY BENNETT, VIC DAMONE , FRANK SINATRA, AL MARTINO, TONY DIAMOND, PERRY COMO ……. TO ME MICHAEL BUBLE IS JUST A 3rd CLASS LOUNGE SINGER NOT MORE? AND I WONDER IF THE FMR CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER MULRONEY DIDN’T INTRODUCED HIM TO THE PRODUCER DAVID FOSTER HE COULD EVEN GET A DEAL TO SING IN A LOCAL JOINT IN CANADA????? MR. BUBLE YOU ARE A FAKER AND YOU DON’T BECOME SINATRA BY SINGING HIS TUNES !

JULIE LONDON THE QUEEN OF FEMALE CROONERS

TO ME JULIE LONDON WAS A TRUE JAZZ FEMALE CROONER WITH HER SUAVE AND SEXY VOICE. SHE WAS HIGHLY UNIQUE AND HER COOL AND FRESH VOICE WAS JUST AMAZING.. DIANA KRALL IN HER OWN WAY REMIND ME JULIE LONDON THEY BOTH SING VERY RELAX AND COOL FREE OF ANY TENSION.JULIE LONDON WAS ONE OF A KIND SHE WAS SIMPLY GORGEOUS AND LOVELY.

JOHNNY HARTMAN WAS THE BLACK SINATRA

JOHNNY HARTMAN WAS THE BLACK SINATRA AND PERHAPS ONE OF THE GREATEST JAZZ CROONER OF ALL TIMES. BUT DUE TO RACISM HIS CAREER DID NOT TAKE OFF AS WELL EXPECTED UNTIL HIS DEATH IN 1983? BUT WE CAN RE DISCOVRER HIS GREAT VOICE NOW AND FEEL HOW GREAT HE WAS ? ONE OF HIS BEST ALBUM IS HIS ALBUM WITH JOHN COLTRANE TO ME IS ONE OF THE BEST JAZZ VOCAL ALBUM OF ALL TIME…. AND WHEN I HEAR THAT PEOPLE PRAISE MICHAEL BUBLE I JUST WANT TO LAUGH CAUSE COMPARED TO JOHNNY HARTMAN HIS JUST A NOVICE SINGER ? BUT THINGS WERE NOT THAT EASY BEFORE …. JOHNNY HARTMAN WAS THE BLACK SINATRA .

FRANK SINTRA NEVER DIE?

THE 15TH OF MAY 2008 WILL BE THE 10TH ANNIVERSARY OF SINATRA DEATH. AND SINCE HIS DEATH NO ONE COULD REPLACE HIM ? HE WAS THE VOICE AND HE WILL REMAIN THE VOICE TILL THE END OF THE TIME. BECAUSE HE WAS A GENUINE ARTIST NOT A FAKE FATSO A SO CALLED CROONER LIKE MICHAEL BUBLE???? NO SIR, SINATRA WAS A LION ROARING VOICE NOT A PUSSY MOANING? HE WAS A KING AT THE GREAT TIME OF CROONERS ???? EVEN THE GREAT TONY BENNETT WAS NOT ABLE TO TOPPLE DOWN SINATRA FROM HIS THRONE. SINATRA RECORDS AND MOVIES WILL REMAIN TILL THE END OF THE TIMES. HE IS THE VOICE FOREVER.

FRANK SINATRA THE BEST

FRANK SINATRA IS GONE SINCE 10 YEARS BUT HIS LEGACY REMAIN VERY STRONG IN THE WORLD OF MUSIC. HE WAS THE VOICE AND EVEN AFTER 10 YEARS HIS VOID IS UNFILLED??? CAUSE SINATRA WAS MORE THAN A SINGER HE WAS A GREAT PERFORMER AND DANCER AND A TRUE TALENTED ACTOR AS WELL. NOW THE TRY TO FILL THIS GAP BY SOME CLOWN LIKE MICHAEL BUBLE OR OTHERS… BUT SORRY THEY CANNOT BE SINATRA SIMPLY CAUSE THEY DO NOT HAVE FRANK’S TALENT AND HIS VOICE AND WE DO NOT BECOME SINATRA BY WEARING A SUIT OR BY SINGING HIS TUNES…. FRANK WAS UNIQUE AND EVEN TONY BENNETT COULDN’T COME CLOSE TO SINATRA? FRANK FOREVER.

MICHAEL BUBLE A VOICELESS SINGER

WELL NOW WE HAVE LOTS OF VOICELESS CROONERS LIKE MICHAEL BUBLE, PETER CINCOTTI ….. HOW THEY CAN CALL THEMSELVES CROONERS WHEN THEY DO NOT HAVE A VOICE TO CROON ????? A CROONER MUST HAVE A VOICE AND TALENTS LIKE TONY BENNETT , SINATRA , PERRY COMO , TONY DIAMOND.. BUT BUBLE HE IS VOICELESS AND CHARMLESS AND TO ME HE IS JUST A KARAOKE SINGER NOT MORE PINO.